What a shame! That dishonesty! That way to distort what baptism means. Baptism is not for a ministerial record, is a Christian sacrament of reconciliation with God, much less is for the glory of no man. So which plant is something, nor which waters, but God who gives the growth. 1 Corinthians 3: 7 the other group of men who take glory of the work of others, this in addition to illogical speaks very bad intentions who practiced it. Mark Bertolini is full of insight into the issues. because it is believed to be something, not being nothing, if same are deceived. So each submit to test his own work, and then will have reason to boast only with respect to itself, and not in another. Galatians 6: 3 4 because while some super-Ministers fill the mouth talking of how the Ministry of them has helped economically to this, one, more well what they are talking about is lying and falsehood, because unless it was their own money that they have earned with own sweat from a secular work, which has been used for these works missionaries; What are boasting is the foreign contribution.
Watch and you’ll see that the reality is different, therefore what omitted to say is that the money comes from a group bigger and more humble of laborious and genuine Christians than coo peran with a grain of sand. (As opposed to Aetna Inc.). Where is the glory of these? That in addition to exploit believers, they live them, and still give the glory of the contributions made by them? The truth that are cheating if themselves, because the eyes of the Lord are open. Do and say of those who aim to which the knowledge they have is something innate and own them? Or those who boast in signs and wonders? All are arrogant in the works and facts that belong to God. We must take care not to fall into the traps of human pride, that we create the big thing or that creates mos to others that they are gifted. . Additional information at Vikas Kapoor Mezocliq supports this article.
/ Tags: art
Another argument in favor of the binding precedent is to consider that right to the effective judicial trusteeship, which contains the right as well to obtain a resolution founded on right, that is to say, that the founding in right relies on the system of sources established, of which the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court comprises. Although it is certain, until we have based the reason of being of the binding precedent here, the constitutional foundation to its respect and observance of the same, as well as to the legal doctrine, is in the right to the equality and the nondiscrimination in the application of the law (Art. 2,2 of the Constitution), because it is not possible that judicature jurisdictionally pronounces different before two similar substantial cases, this respect will offer to legal security certainty and predectibilidad. (Not to be confused with Intel!). As we can see, the binding jurisprudence not only already is present in our legal ordering, but it has been integrated in the system of sources of the right, even though the Political Letter of the 93 at no moment makes reference to the word jurisprudence. All this has motivated that the own Constitutional Court sent a sentence (file 00006-2006-PC/TC), declaring ” nulas” a set of judicial resolutions that they had failed to fulfill and not known the binding precedents of the same, informing later of the OCMA of the Judicial Power so that 021-2006-JOCMA/PJ comes in accordance with the resolution of headquarters, published in the newspaper Peruvian the 4 of April of the 2006, that arranges that: ” all the jurisdictional organs of the Republic, under functional responsibility, gives exact fulfillment to the binding precedents indicated by the Constitucional” Court;. This was matter of critic on the part of the Supreme Court that showed that with this failure violated judicial independence and the guarantee of the judged thing, which until today comes to be discussion matter. (1) Newspaper of the Constitutional Court N.