On them and stopped, because the aquatic environment, their properties, imposes certain limitations, to the same experiments on the creation of biological objects on the ground in air yielded positive results. Further Work in this direction will focus on the creation of plants and animals on land, in air environment and adapt the results achieved in the aquatic environment to the air. Make a small digression. Already Now, even not fully understand what it represents man, mankind, through its most advanced members, creating robots that are often found on people and their creators are trying to invest in them their way of thinking. This is to ensure that we are created in His image.
Man, since its inception, inspired the idea that he being the most sensible thing in the universe and other such things happen. As a biological creature in the foreseeable space is possible because it is, because among the wildlife people is the most advanced and at the moment is the maximum achievement of our founders. Must immediately tell them thank you for this! Many may become angry about their artificial origin. And it is in vain, as our founders may well be too artificially created beings, but are much earlier passed the period, which is now being of humanity and are naturally more advanced in thinking and the abilities and capabilities and are, as the saying goes, a huge experience of constant life that mankind has only to be bought. And hopefully it will happen, and mankind will overcome those quite complex obstacles in its path of development. If we consider the difference between a naturally formed sentient beings and artificially created intelligent beings, then in thinking there is practically no difference.
And the worst part is that this savagery is fixed in international law as the principle of inviolability of frontiers and territorial integrity, a principle which can perhaps be called the greatest folly, born of the 20th century. Since the birth of human society, and to this day, the main problem of giving birth the vast majority of social conflicts is the issue of distribution between individuals, classes, nations and states of life benefits. And because social progress, since the birth of human society and To this day, there is progress the distribution system in a society of subsistence among the members of this society. And because the vast majority of social revolutions since the birth of human society, and to this day, had his to a more equitable distribution of vital goods among members of society. Progress of the "individual – the individual" is, above all, improving the distribution of wealth produced in society, or that one and the same decrease the degree of exploitation of man by man. In the laws of dialectical development of social systems and non-social is a very important difference. Deviation from the equilibrium state of any non-social system at once also automatically leads to the birth of the "struggle" aimed at addressing this imbalance. Deviation from the same state of equilibrium of the social system does not lead to an automatic birth "control", because resolution of social dialectical contradictions are always mediated through the consciousness of forming a system of individuals, classes, nations and states, consciousness, organize and control the resolution of social contradictions.
Such information had been published by the international media, without much repercussion, but wanting to demonstrate that much public mount of money already was being used for the maintenance of Armed Forces in Haiti, instead of being destined for humanitarian real actions. The Haitian man power is extremely cheap, what also it generated certain covets of international companies will usufruct of this service. E, not to lose the imperialista domain, the international Army many times is used to contain the syndical Forces and the popular, estudantis movements and of quarter. Today, this country necessary not to be raised and supported socially, despertando a national and patriotic feeling, of what in others as many areas where also it is devoid. Until the conflict of Cuba with the United States it had some repercussion.
The country of Fidel, when liberating the skies for the action of the American airplanes, in favor of the humanitarian aid to the Haitians, of certain form brightened up a conflict and gave opening still insufficient to the diplomatical relations. It is also seen that the troop of soldiers of U.S.A. is exaggerated in view of the size of the population, here has a clear measure to intervine in the social mobilizations. They are 20 a thousand North American soldiers; increased the foreign ones one adds 30 a thousand, for 9 million people. The expenses with the maintenance of these troops since the ingression of the same ones are well superior to the one of the value excused for the humanitarian aids. However, this people is in an extremely vulnerable situation, changes in the collective thought is natural in this phase of transistion a country. Thus, no country has the Right to intervine in the pacific manifestations of the people, as well as influencing its movements politicians.
Before, to support the development and to guarantee stability while the nation goes gaining autonomy. It urges to take to the Haitian people growth conditions, taking care of to the necessities that the proper society has clamado. what it will be more useful is the cooperation accomplishes of all the nations in this process of formation and philosophical-social consolidation. For certain, the maintenance of the physical vitality, with foods; politics, helping in the election process that it will occur and of security with the Army, they are of great value. However, bigger attention must be given to the priorities that if confuse with the proper existence of that society, given its importance. observed the principles of not motivated concern of egosticos interests when of the aid humanitarian, but endowed with absolutely solidary matrix to a country that in a future not very distant can be an aggregate fort to the World-wide Order.
/ Tags: philosophy
This distinguishing boarding of the body by means of the religion implies a relation of control and being able, normatizada under the influence of partner-cultural context and politician, who establishes the acceptable social contours, so that let us have a vision so only naturalistic concerning what he means the homossexualidade (FOCAULT, 1988). To follow models, they are which will be, lead us it a painful freedom: the freedom of a continuous to create, to make responsible by itself, making of itself a molded workmanship, that hinder in them to create a life way that admits the plurality, a way that recrie of complete and autocrtica form, ways to sobrepujar any species of normatividade that is harmful to the exercise of the democracy and the freedom. The positioning of the religions in relation to the homossexualidade has been reason of many controversies and controversies in the society (BRASH, 1998). But, what we have that to have in consideration is that the studies had advanced in this direction and the homossexualidade is not considered an illness, as has years the age behind, the studies of the cultural anthropology point with respect to the understanding of the homossexualidade in the societies of adverse form, that is, it is part of the world that we know, therefore, she is seen in different ways in diverse cultures. What it exists of problematic in our society occidental person is that the bodies they are carrying of values, inculcados for gestures that become them the place of being able, gestures that if they transform into dominant cultural values and that they develop a system of exclusions based on literal readings of fundamentalist religious texts and that if they become the normative one to support the bases of the relations in the society. These questions are in slow maturation in our society, but the homossexualidade is a fact that if imposes and that it cannot be denied or be disrespected by the religion and the society in itself.
/ Tags: philosophy