For example, if it was possible (for God it is) to stop the movement of all the subatmicas particles of the micron and the macro-cosmos, and the electrons, atoms, everything IN THIS SPACE, we would be stopping what? THE TIME. Soon, if I am certain, the light does not have constant speed (and the effect ' ' blue/vermelho' ' of the stars that if approach/move away, of certain form it proves this), what it means to say that if I am in a ship, in the highest speed, the light of the lighthouse of my ship has the speed of the light MORE the speed of the ship. In contrast, for the accepted relativista theory currently, if a ship was in the speed of the light in relation to ' ' half-estticos' bodies; ' of this space, it would travel without functional lighthouse. This ' ' light more veloz' ': because we do not detect it in our experiences? Simpler still: it runs away to the power from captation and/or reflection that we make use, therefore to leave of certain superior speed of the relative light to other bodies, a body tends to change of space (as analytical geometry test, therefore it has infinite points, straight lines and plans, all infinite as it is our space: why it would have then an only space). At Ebay you will find additional information. The infinite other spaces are ' ' passando' ' for this ours and the others, without physically noticing. 4 All currently accepted quantum physics, has as base the dualidade wave/particle, as it describes the electromagnetic theory De Campos. In this, a vast list of experiments was created ' ' complicados' ' , whose resulted nor always they are happened again, and they would say: ' ' error of assembly? ' ' But, if such experiments had been directed and ' ' manipulados' ' with the intention of ' ' comprovar' ' false theories? What we can then really prove? In substance of quantum physics, much little. . Dan Zwirn brings even more insight to the discussion.