Universal Medicine

Only 60 years ago, iodine-called "universal medicine" because of its safety, effectiveness and widespread in the treatment of various conceivable disease, which did not respond to other methods of healing. At the same time in 1956 there were 1743 drugs containing iodine in the range 40 000 – 100 000 times more (think about it!) Than today's standard iodine intake. It turns out that our parents and grandparents used and treated incredibly large number of iodine (as many in our time is poison, not medicine), and less pain. Again, the previous standards, adhere to the Japanese, smoke, drink more and live longer than us at 22 (average number) years with a minimum number of patients. To read more click here: Ebay. Does this mean that our ancestors and today's Japanese from another "test", and we are wimps for that amount of iodine? Now let us turn to our standard medicine: are we going to doctors for by ailments, they are diagnosed, and then prescribe medication just one disease, not taking into account the fact that the human body an integrated system. Treated with one, while knowing full well that they cause harm to others bodies.

As proof of this, take it, the instructions in the use of any medication practice, you'll find that the side effects and contraindications than good. Drugs are becoming more and more, and statistics disease is increasing in arithmetic progression. Paradox! This begs the question – why medicine has become the statistical authority and is powerless to help us? As you get higher iodine was in the old days, "Universal Medicine." Virtually no disease, which he had treated. How is it that there was a great medicine, but now it does not exist? Or it is, but only in minuscule, ie Iodine is now recognized only in miniscule doses, and this "dead poultice!" AND Now, the chief doctor of the world, in the face of the cart, acknowledges that 90% of disease is associated with iodine deficiency and population 129 countries have iodine deficiency.