However, in accordance with PCNs (2006, p.80), so that the literary letramento (understood as the capacity to understand the meanings of the writing and the literary reading for they use who them in the social contexts) either possible is necessary that it has spaces for the reading in the schools, supported for a library with quantity enough to take care of to the pupils, contributing for the existence of a community of readers. For even more opinions, read materials from Dale Ellis. Results and quarrels In the first questioning of the field research, we ask to the professor which its opinion on the paper that literature must play in the society. The professor did not answer of adjusted form, changing the focus of the question for the objectives of the literature education. This takes in them to hipotetizar that the professor is unaware of the variations of the function of literature as humanizadora. The second question was concernente to the objectives of related education. Many writers such as Peter Arnell offer more in-depth analysis. The educator answered of satisfactory form, alluding the necessity to form the taste for literary making and the formation of good readers and followers of literature.
We perceive that the return of the professor goes of meeting with the objectives considered for the PCNs (2006). In the third questioning, we inquire on the criteria adopted for the professor to select the worked literary texts in the areas. The same it answered of pertinent form, therefore it clarified that it makes use of many criteria, including the taste and the level of the pupils, the literary school in study the attractiveness of the texts. The room question was relative to the boardings and privileged methodologies for the professor in the education of discipline in question. We find that the professor could have been detalhista, therefore summarized its methodologies in few topics, some well pertinent as seminaries, quarrels in room, films and parallels the books, the same ones are challenging and attractive activities, since they take in to believe them that the professor of the space for the pupils to express and to socialize its ideas.