Tag Archive for Tag: science

Tag: science Aristotle

This is often used synonymously with “property”. ” So in this search process we get that quality or quality is a “category” and it means “way of enunciation” comes from Aristotle, who was the first to give a ranking of these universal concepts, grouped into 10 orders, namely: In substance, eg home, man. In quantity, eg 3, 4 meters. Quality, such as: white, well. Relationship, such triple major. Place, eg on the street. Of time, eg yesterday, last year. Position, eg lying, standing. State, ie is armed, ill. Action, eg eating, short. Pressure, eg has been cut, has been burned. If you look at any time within the categories of Aristotle, speaks of “Quality”, his third category is quality, however, raises and agreed that it introduced into the first category, both Kant and Hegel study this category: “The quality and the latter is included within the categories of being. Within Homonatropia considers it is more referred to, being, and spirituality, among others coinciding with: Kursanov and Kusin, among others, who define its meaning as: “the set of essential features that make an object or phenomenon what it is and not another. It is acceptable for the development or within the evolutionary process concepts tend to change or adapt to time by the circumstances as noted by Frederick Engels: “that with the development of science, the definitions of the categories could be complemented with ideas current “is probably one of those who start using the term as” that in the particular technical field of the production quality and service that has not been an exception since it has been strongly supported in the first philosophical category quality and the passing of time have been added other items, thus having multiple meanings, even considers the character by various specialists polysemantic characteristic of this term, which increasingly widens the multidimensionality of it.

View Article...

Tag: science Components

We do not believe in more than three spatial dimensions, because when some theorists, as the defenders of string theory, try to explain what the other spatial dimensions, especially the fifth, sixth, seventh and so on, what I do understand is that they refer to multiple "dimensions" as coordinates Finite dimensional then you can imagine shapes: flat, curved, round-wound, parallel or bent, but anyway are not really other spatial dimensions, because they are not infinite coordinates, but rather dimensions of the parts and components of the beings that want to locate in three dimensional space. We seem to confuse the general spatial dimensions and infinite in finite dimensions and specific forms of the components and the positions that can take people into space. Sometimes, even, come to imply that the problem of other multiple dimensions can not be understood by normal people and normal intelligence, almost argue that this is a topic of gifted and gifted. We give as an example of the difficulty in understanding the multiple dimensions existence of other examples, like the story, that one observer sees the cable distance Extended energy and I think it's a line that has only one dimension, which is its length. But that ants walking on the wire is clear that the cable has other dimensions such as thickness and also consists of helical strands, which appear to be gimped for them, other "dimensions", simply that the observer, by far not can understand why the do not see them. These arguments were questioned, is that the thickness of the cable and its respective coil are no longer contained within the first three simple infinite dimensions, all those normal people know and understand.

View Article...